End of Neutrality

Was neutrality in the 1930s in the United States’ best interest?

In 1940, Roosevelt embarked on a monthslong campaign to convince the public and Congress that Britain and its allies urgently needed U.S. support. To do so without entering the war, he believed that he needed more foreign policy power. In contrast to the earlier debates over neutrality, this time he was successful. Despite anti-interventionist pushback, Congress passed the Lend-Lease Act in March 1941. The act gave unprecedented authority to the president, authorizing him to supply war matériel to “any country whose defense the president deems vital to the defense of the United States.” Over the course of the war, Roosevelt would use those powers to provide more than $50 billion in assistance to countries fighting the Axis powers.  

On December 7, 1941, the Japanese attack on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor shattered Americans’ sense of security from war. The next day, Congress declared war on Japan, entering World War II and definitively concluding the debate around neutrality.  

It’s uncertain whether, had the United States firmly opposed the Axis powers early on, World War II could have been avoided. Still, U.S. neutrality removed a potential bulwark against the rising aggression that led to the war.  

World War II was even more calamitous than World War I, causing more than sixty million deaths. Countries emerged determined to prevent such a conflict from reoccurring. With the United States leading the way, a new international order took shape, centered on international institutions designed to promote peaceful cooperation. The United Nations, founded in 1945, stood at the center of that order. Unlike the League of Nations, the United States not only joined the organization but also continues to host its headquarters to this day. Twenty-five years after turning away from Wilson’s proposal of a world order founded on international cooperation, the United States was instrumental in bringing that vision to life.  
 

On the following page is a discussion activity about the neutrality debate. Alongside that activity, consider these discussion questions:  

• Was pursuing neutrality in the 1930s the right choice? Why or why not?  
• Could earlier U.S. opposition to fascist aggression have prevented or shortened World War II?  
• What lessons do you think the United States took from the interwar neutrality experience? How did those lessons shape postwar foreign policy?  
• Compare the foreign policy challenges the United States faced in the 1930s to the challenges it faces today. What similarities or differences do you see?