North Korean Nuclear Threat (NSC)

Guide to the Role-Play

There is no right or wrong way to participate in a role-play, but the better prepared you are, the more likely you will be able to advance a position effectively, and the more you and your peers will get out of the experience.
Be patient during the role-play. Do not hold back from sharing your perspective, but be sure to give others a chance to do the same.
Where there are competing interests, make the judgment calls that you would make if you were a government official, as informed by your earlier consideration of potential trade-offs. Ensure that the consequences of various decisions are carefully weighed.

Round	Timing	Objectives	Procedural Notes
One:	2 to 3 minutes per participant	Present initial positions to the president. Investigate the nuances of the positions through questioning. Clarify the central questions to be debated.	Each participant presents their position statement. If time permits, the president may ask questions to understand each NSC member’s position and bring out the essential questions they wish to debate.
Two	30 to 60 minutes	Clarify the obstacles, risks, opportunities, and threats. Evaluate the various positions on their merits.	This is the debate portion of the role-play, when participants can defend their recommendations against others’ and identify potential areas of compromise agreement.
Three	30 to 60 minutes	Narrow the options to a few comprehensive and well- focused strategies that the president prefers. Provide the president with clear recommendations (from NSC members), perhaps as a consensus or through a vote. Arrive at a final presidential decision.	This round should start with the president’s stating one to three preferred options to be fleshed out.